A church tower in Northhampton in the UK got some cheekier projections than they wanted from Aspers Casino nearby
You understand what they say: sex offers. And with that in mind, one UK casino in Northampton thought that projecting the image of a model might draw a small awareness of their operation and create some buzz round the city. Unfortunately, the church they decided to show the model on didn’t appreciate having the seductive and image that is suggestive of woman displayed on their clock tower.
Model Citizen, or Not
The incident started whenever a local casino known as Aspers decided that they wished to market their Valentine’s Day ‘strip poker evening’ promotion one that included three models (two feminine, one male). They figured that an alluring 30-foot high projection of 1 of the ‘Page 3 girls’ involved is simply the thing to spread the word and generate some interest and excitement about their future event.
What’s less clear is why they decided to project that image on the tower of All Saints, a local northampton church. That led to outrage from church officials, who say they were not consulted for making use of their building within the stunt.
‘We are offended that this was done,’ said Father David McConkey, the priest at All Saints. ‘ No permission was gained or sought. We would be grateful for an apology for this misuse of a sacred room.’
McConkey said him, and one eventually showed him a photo of the projection on the tower that he didn’t know of the stunt until after parishioners started to contact.
‘It seems really improper to me,’ McConkey said. ‘this building is wanted by us to be an indication of God in the community. The organization has never contacted me or asked any permission to do this. I don’t want to look po-faced, but we wouldn’t normally have provided permission for this.’
Diocese Balks (or at Least Wants Payment)
The Diocese of Peterborough additionally weighed in on the presssing issue, saying that even disregarding the content, the methods used by Aspers were highly improper.
‘[The diocese is] disappointed that Aspers Casino has tried to use a church building for advertising an event that is commercial offering payment and without even having the decency to seek permission first,’ said a diocese spokesperson.
The publicity stunt wasn’t a move that is popular locals, either. Local Ruth that is resident Campbell it was a ‘distasteful attack on the church and our faith,’ and the group No More Page 3 which has campaigned to prevent the sun’s rays from continuing to publish photos of topless models on page 3 of their newspaper.
‘Good that there is been a backlash,’ tweeted No More Page 3. ‘ Local groups that are feminist needed for fighting these local fights as well.’
The casino, however, has maybe not issued a formal apology, though they did declare that the move wasn’t intended to offend anybody from the church or town.
‘ We did not mean to cause offense in any real way at all and it absolutely was purely meant in good spirit,’ an Aspers Casino representative said. ‘Our alternative Valentine’s Strip Poker event on night is a bit of fun and slightly tongue on cheek, plus it is free for all to enter. friday’
Aspers Casino Northampton is simply one of four Aspers casinos in britain. Other locations include Stratford, Newcastle, and a casino that is new Milton Keynes.
Aria Casino and MGM Resorts International Could Face Obstruction Fines
A Nevada Gaming Control Board issue against Las vegas, nevada Strip casino Aria and its particular partial owner MGM Resorts could cause big fines for the casino company
The Nevada gaming environment is unquestionably one of the most regulated and above-board you will find anywhere; having gone from its early days as a cash-skimming free-for-all run by the Mafia to a legitimate and above-board industry that few could question runs quite transparently and contains numerous checks and balances to make sure fairness and sincerity in its dealings.
To that end, state video gaming agents receive almost free license to show up unannounced and make certain everything is copacetic in any given casino, and obviously because of its visibility and high gambling volume the Las Vegas Strip is a prime target for these appearances.
Aria Does Not Play Ball
However now it appears that certainly one of these Strip casinos the chi-chi Aria that falls under the partial auspices of video gaming operator MGM Resorts International is being fined by the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB), carrying out a two-count complaint filed late last week that says two associated with state’s gaming agents were blocked access at the casino from viewing wagering activities, specifically in Aria’s high-limit realms. The issue notes that while two state gaming agents were set up and watching two high-rollers perform roulette in the casino’s exclusive Salon Privé, their view had been blocked, making it impossible for them to do their jobs, even though they were reportedly just ‘5 to 7 legs’ from the gaming area they were trying to view.
Casinos need to walk a line that is fine these matters: protecting and respecting their well-heeled clients’ wishes, while also allowing regulatory authorities to do their jobs. In this case, it seems that an Aria supervisor in the room went past an acceptable limit within the direction that is former his consumers told him they ‘did not need to be watched.’
The supervisor went as far as to see the agents if they continued to insist on watching that he would call security to intercede between their view and the roulette table play itself.
‘One of the agents asked if all casino games had been ready to accept the general public together with agent was told [that] ‘observation of the roulette game was maybe not welcome,” noted the NGCB report.
Perhaps Not Their Very First Rodeo
Adding fuel for this regulatory fire, based on the complaint, is the fact that this is not an MGM casino’s first run-in of this kind. The report reported that the casino conglomerate have been previously slapped on the hand for similar violations at other MGM properties, going right back as far as 2010, and that the business ‘has historically been [made] aware of the need for vigilance in ensuring that people has use of video gaming.’
Compared to that end, the report proceeded, MGM had guaranteed the NGCB at the start of last year why these problems were in order, and that at ‘each of the MGM’s luxury properties, such as the Aria, [they would] make sure public access to gaming wouldn’t be restricted.’
However, the complaint continued, the company had nonetheless fallen short when it came to ‘conduct[ing] gaming operations in accordance with proper criteria of custom, decorum and decency.’
In response, MGM Resorts spokesman Gordon Absher stated in an email that his operation ‘respects the Gaming Control Board greatly and acknowledge our employee did not follow business procedures in this example. Aria is focused on a high level of regulatory conformity and looks forward to resolving this matter in the not too distant future. We expect to provide this matter to your Gaming Commission and now we trust that this process will create a reasonable result and provide clarity for all of us continue.’
Having a 50 % ownership stake into the CityCenter development of which Aria is the crown jewel, MGM could now be liable for anywhere from $25,000 as much as $250,000 for each of those counts, unless money is reached before that is set. If it’s not, a Nevada Gaming Commission hearing date shall be scheduled to find out what those fines is going to be.
Connecticut Casinos Hardball that is playing to Unpaid Gambling Debts
While many industry experts say that two Connecticut casinos are playing hardball within their gambling commercial collection agency practices, it still beats the way they did it back in the(Image: Casino movie still day)
Two major Connecticut gambling enterprises Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun are in the centre associated with the battle for casino licenses in Massachusetts for a while now. Those promotions have required negotiating that is tough shrewd land deals, and convincing locals that the specific casino organizations have actually the area’s best interests in mind.
But for some Massachusetts residents whom have run up debts with these casinos that are same their collection techniques against some Bay State deadbeats are not quite as warm and fuzzy.
Lien and Mean
In accordance with Massachusetts media reports, the two casinos have combined to place dozens of liens on homes in that continuing state, in an attempt to gather from gamblers whom couldn’t manage to spend the debts they’d run up by gambling. This tactic was used for at the very least a decade, and has sometimes been used to get from players who owed the casinos as low as a few thousand dollars.
‘It’s extremely hardcore predatory behavior,’ said Tom Coates, operator of a credit counseling service in Iowa.
For instance, take the full case of Louis H. Cutler. He’s a retiree that is 80-year-old lives in Revere and enjoyed playing at both Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods. But in 2006, whenever he couldn’t repay $36,000 that he was indeed lent by the casino to gamble with, Mohegan Sun put a lien on a home that he partially owned.
But that ended up beingn’t the end of Cutler’s issues aided by the casinos. In 2007, Foxwoods discovered that Cutler had been not likely to cover them straight back either, so they too put a lien on their household in an attempt to collect an additional $30,600.
For several, tales such as this have led to questions over how gamblers like Cutler are approved for such loans. In 2007, Cutler was forced to file for bankruptcy, where he declared that his income that is only was Social Security check for $640 each month. Yet, despite his paltry earnings, he was loaned a total of more than $66,000 from the 2 casinos combined.
Debate Over Industry Tactics
Gambling enterprises have always been notoriously aggressive when collecting debts, but this tactic may go beyond what most gaming companies are willing to do to have their funds back. Skillfully developed state that going after a gambler’s home to be able to collect a debt is virtually unusual.
‘Frankly, I have perhaps not been aware of any casino company that goes after homes,’ said I. Nelson Rose, a teacher and expert on gambling law. ‘It’s really extreme.’
However, the casinos in question say that their tactics aren’t that out of line with other people in the industry, also if they decide to pass a route that is slightly different their rivals.
‘Your inference that our methods of seeking repayment are somehow more aggressive than other gaming companies is not accurate,’ said Mohegan Sun chief of staff Charles Bunnell in a letter. Bunnell pointed out that in Nevada, unpaid gambling debts are occasionally prosecuted as crimes if they cannot be gathered.
In fact, they are considered bad checks from a legal standpoint, and are either settled out of court for undisclosed amounts, or prosecuted, as a recent such case for $12.9 million owed to two major vegas casinos indicates, among others.
When it comes to Cutler, the casino says he first filed for credit with the casino in 1996, and also at the time, had plenty of assets to pay his loan back. It wasn’t until 2004 when the debt started to accumulate. The casino says they wanted to settle the debt for about 15 per cent associated with the total owed, but Cutler declined to do so.
In accordance with casino consultant Gary Green, who has previously handled gambling enterprises, players usually leave a check with the casino in exchange for almost any money they are loaned. He says that using a lien to collect a gambling debt is ‘ridiculous.’
‘ From a PR standpoint, you can’t have it both ways,’ Green said. ‘If we’re going to argue to legislators and the public…that we’re an entertainment company, we can’t at the same time be foreclosing on individuals’s homes.’
Foxwoods has so far aussie-pokies.club declined to comment on their collection practices.
We’d argue it’s still gentler than the collection that is old-fashioned from the very early casino days in Las vegas, nevada, where knee caps, fingers and sometimes even lives were taken, and without the anticipatory liens.